Making Conferences Work for You

Graduate seminar · Department of Chemical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University

Soorathep Kheawhom

17 August 2026

 

A conference is not a reward
for work already finished.

It is an instrument you deploy
to answer a question.

Everything in the next fifty minutes follows from this one sentence.

Fifty minutes, five parts

Today

  • 4 min Why a conference is an instrument
  • 8 min Choosing the right meeting
  • 8 min The months before you travel
  • 10 min Designing the talk and the poster
  • 9 min Handling questions in English
  • 6 min The first 48 hours after you return
  • 10 min Questions

Interrupt earlier if something is unclear. The last ten minutes are yours either way.

Three questions a laboratory cannot answer

Why this is an instrument

Is the question still open?

Whether someone across the world solved your problem eight months ago and has not published it yet.

Does the argument survive contact?

Whether your interpretation holds when a stranger who has no reason to be kind attacks it.

Who would work with you?

Which people have the instrument, the sample, or the model you are missing — and would say yes.

If a meeting cannot answer at least one of these for the work you have right now, it is tourism.

Choosing the right meeting

Part 1 · 8 minutes

Match the venue to the stage the work is at, not to the prestige you would like.

Three stages, three kinds of meeting

Part 1

Early

An idea and a trend

Domestic or regional meeting, small session. The goal is criticism, not visibility — you want the awkward question now, while the design can still change.

Take the poster. Thirty minutes per person beats three.

Middle

A result you believe

Specialist international meeting in your subfield. The goal is to test the interpretation against people who know the system as well as you do.

Fight for the oral slot. This is where collaborations start.

Late

A paper near submission

Large flagship meeting, or an invited talk. The goal is priority, visibility, and reviewer familiarity.

Least useful for improving the work. It is already fixed.

One question decides it: what would have to happen at this meeting for the trip to have been worth it?

Reading a meeting before you commit

Part 1

  1. Who chairs the sessions? Look at the symposium organizers, not the plenary list. Organizers decide who is in the room.
  2. Where does the abstract end up? Reviewed abstract, full proceedings paper, or nothing? This decides whether the work is still publishable later.
  3. Who came last time? Find last year’s programme. If the three groups you cite most are absent, it is the wrong meeting.
  4. What is the cost per useful contact? Registration plus travel, divided by the number of people you realistically expect to talk to.

Warning signs — an invitation email that flatters you · a scope covering five unrelated fields · a fee due before review · a venue that changes city every year · no named programme committee

The months before you travel

Part 2 · 8 minutes

Everything that decides the value of the trip is decided before you board.

Plan backward from the abstract deadline

Part 2

T−6 months Decide the claim Name the one sentence you intend to defend. Identify the experiment still missing to support it.

T−4 months Close the data gap Run the missing measurement. Assume one repeat will fail, and budget for it.

T−3 months Submit the abstract Promise the result you will have. Not the topic you are working on.

T−6 weeks Build the materials Figures at final quality. Draft slides or poster. Travel booked, paperwork started.

T−2 weeks Rehearse and target Two full rehearsals with questions. Write down the people and sessions you are going for.

The abstract is a contract, not a title. “The effect of X on Y was investigated” tells the committee you do not yet know what you found.

Four things to have ready before you fly

Part 2

1

A 30-second introduction

Who you are, which group, what problem you work on. Rehearsed until it bores you. You will use it forty times.

2

A 2-minute version of the work

Question, approach, key result, why it matters. No slides. This is what you say standing next to a coffee urn.

3

A one-page summary to leave behind

Title, one figure, three results, your email, a QR code to the preprint. People lose business cards; they keep paper with a figure on it.

4

A named target list

Five people you want to meet. Three sessions you will not miss. One question you want answered. Written down, on your phone.

Designing for the time you are given

Part 3 · 10 minutes

A twelve-minute talk is not a short seminar. A poster is not a paper on a wall.

Anatomy of a 12 + 3 talk

Part 3

  • 2 min · Why should anyone care? The problem, in the audience’s language. One sentence they could repeat at dinner.
  • 3 min · What exactly did you do? Enough method for a stranger to believe the data. Not the full protocol.
  • 5 min · What did you find? The core. Two or three figures, each with one message said out loud.
  • 2 min · What does it mean? Interpretation, the honest limitation, and the one thing you would do next.

One message per slide, written as the slide title · about one slide per minute · memorize only the first 60 seconds and the last 30 · finish 30 seconds early

A poster is read at three distances

Part 3

3 m

The title does the work

Three seconds, while walking past. Write the finding, not the topic. “Additive X triples zinc anode life” stops people. “A study of additives for zinc anodes” does not.

1 m

One figure carries the claim

A visitor who stops gives you thirty seconds of silent reading. One large central figure, labelled so it works without you standing beside it.

arm’s length

The detail is there if asked

Method, conditions and controls in small type at the edges. Present for the specialist, invisible to everyone else.

Stand beside your poster, not in front of it · open with “May I give you the two-minute version?” · put your name and email large enough to photograph

Handling questions in English

Part 4 · 9 minutes

Nobody in that room is grading your grammar. They are watching how you think.

Almost every question is one of five

Part 4

1

Clarification

“What was the scan rate?” Easy. Answer in one sentence and stop talking.

2

Challenge to the method

“How do you know it is not an artefact?” Name the control you ran — or concede that you have not run it.

3

Alternative explanation

“Could this be X instead?” Often the most useful question you will get. Say what evidence would separate the two.

4

Scope and generality

“Does this work for other systems?” Answer where the boundary is, not a hopeful yes.

5

“Have you seen my paper?”

Rarely hostile. Thank them, write the reference down where they can see you do it, and mean it.

One structure for every answer

Part 4

1 Acknowledge “Thank you, that is an important point.” Buys three seconds and costs nothing.

2 Restate “So you are asking whether the capacity loss comes from the anode rather than the electrolyte?” Lets them correct you cheaply.

3 Answer in one sentence The direct answer first. Not the background, not the history.

4 Offer the detail “I can show the control experiment if that is useful.” Let them choose to go deeper.

“Could you repeat the question, please?” · “I want to make sure I understood — do you mean …?” · “I do not know. What would settle it is …” · “That is a fair criticism, and here is what we did about it.” · “Could we continue this at the coffee break?”

The first 48 hours after you return

Part 5 · 6 minutes

This is where most conference value is lost — quietly, and permanently.

Convert the trip before it evaporates

Part 5

Before you land

Write the trip note. Two pages on the plane, while it is fresh: what you learned, who you met, what changed in your plan.

Within 24 hours

Send the follow-ups. Three sentences each: where we met, what we discussed, what I propose next. Attach the one-pager. After a week they no longer remember your face.

Within 48 hours

Turn questions into work. Every question you could not answer becomes an experiment, a control, a paper to read, or a paragraph to rewrite.

Within a week

Report back to the group. Fifteen minutes at group meeting is how one funded trip becomes useful to twelve people.

Send the follow-up emails from the airport. Waiting until you feel rested means waiting until it is too late.

Judge the trip by what changed

If you remember three things

  1. Choose on purpose The meeting must match the stage the work is at. Prestige is not a criterion.
  2. Design for the time you are given Twelve minutes, one message per slide. Three metres, a title that states a finding.
  3. Close the loop within 48 hours Trip note, follow-up emails, questions turned into experiments.

A conference is a research instrument. Before the next one you attend, write down what you intend it to measure.