SKH Writing Program — Editorial Map

A planning reference for the five essay series on skhgroup.net. The goal: keep every series distinct, so the same topic can appear in more than one series deliberately, from a different angle — never by accident.


1. The five series — mode, voice, and signature

Each series is separated by who speaks, to whom, from when — not by topic. That is what keeps them from blurring.

  Series Mode / voice Signature device
A Through the Thinkers A thinker’s lens on research (philosophy) Open “What X might say”; close “Every morning, a researcher should ask…”
B Beyond Metrics First person, present — self & the system Open with a common belief, then complicate it; close on a reframe (no daily-question)
C Lessons from Science A lab phenomenon → a life truth (metaphor) Open with the concrete science; cross to life; close holding both in parallel
D Letters to My Younger Self Present self → past self (retrospective) “Dear Soorathep, 20XX —”; close with one line from the present
E The Craft of Research Practical how-to for the reader (evergreen) Open with the failure mode / why it matters; close with a short checklist or principle

2. Topic × Series matrix

Rows are recurring themes. Each cell is the angle that series would take (— = weak fit, skip).

Theme A · Thinkers B · Beyond Metrics C · Lessons from Science D · Letters E · Craft
Rejection & peer review Popper/Feynman: being shown wrong is the method Why Good Papers Get Rejected — what it reveals about the system Rejection as annealing: heat before the lattice reorders On Rejection — my first one How to respond to reviewers
Originality Kuhn: questioning assumptions The Loneliness of Original Ideas — the emotional cost Original ideas as metastable states — need stabilising Trust the odd idea Telling novelty from noise
Impact & recognition Confucius (legacy), Frankl (meaning) The Invisible Impact · Beyond H-index · Next Stage Catalysis: you enable reactions without being consumed Recognition comes late, if at all Writing a broader-impact statement
Failure & error Popper: advances by finding where we’re wrong Reframing failure in a metrics culture The Value of Failure in the Laboratory The experiments that failed taught me most Designing experiments that fail informatively
Time & pace Seneca (time), Marcus (control) The Slow Science Advantage Equilibrium Is Not Always Progress — kinetics vs thermodynamics You have more time than you think Planning long experiments
Curiosity & motivation Socrates: the expanding unknown Why Curiosity Ages Better Than Ambition Activation energy: curiosity lowers the barrier Protect your curiosity Keeping a question alive
Collaboration & competition Confucius: growing others Reflection on competition culture Every Interface Changes Both Sides On Collaboration · On Competition Authorship & credit norms
Integrity & honesty Feynman: don’t fool yourself Integrity under pressure Calibration: honesty as staying calibrated Guard your name Publication ethics in practice
Identity & becoming Jung: the academic shadow What kind of scholar am I becoming Phase transitions: identity changes state Before You Become a Professor
AI in research AI and the meaning of authorship Information & entropy The tools will change; the questions won’t Using AI responsibly in writing & review
Writing & figures A figure is a compression of a truth Learn to write early How to structure a paper; designing figures

3. Per-series starter queues

A · Through the Thinkerscomplete (10 + capstone) Jung · Marcus Aurelius · Buddha · Popper · Feynman · Kuhn · Socrates · Frankl · Seneca · Confucius → Becoming a Better Researcher

B · Beyond Metrics — 2 live, queue: Beyond H-index ✓ · The Next Stage of Academic Growth ✓ · The Invisible Impact · Why Good Papers Get Rejected · The Loneliness of Original Ideas · The Slow Science Advantage · When Reviewers Are Right · Why Curiosity Ages Better Than Ambition

C · Lessons from Science — signature series, queue: What Batteries Taught Me About Life · Entropy and Human Decisions · The Value of Failure in the Laboratory · Equilibrium Is Not Always Progress · Every Interface Changes Both Sides (candidates to extend: Activation Energy · Calibration · Phase Transitions · Catalysis · Signal and Noise · Hysteresis)

D · Letters to My Younger Self — queue (as dated letters): Before You Chase Your First Paper · Before You Become a Professor · On Rejection · On Collaboration · On Competition · On Mentoring

E · The Craft of Research — evergreen, queue: The Hypothesis · Originality · Peer Review · Being a Reviewer · Scientific Writing · Figures · Reproducibility · AI in Publishing · Research Integrity (candidates to extend: The Literature Review · Revision · Preprints · Data Management)


4. Three rules to keep them distinct

  1. Separate by voice, not topic. If two drafts feel alike, the fix is the mode (see §1), not a new topic.
  2. One idea, one angle per series. Use the matrix: assign a shared theme its distinct treatment in each series before writing.
  3. Don’t launch all five at once. A is complete; run B + C next, add D + E once those have momentum. Quality over count — let each series be open-ended, not locked at 20.